http://news.bbc.co.uk/YouTube moves to the small screenA deal between YouTube and US mobile firm Verizon Wireless will see the popular video-sharing website extended to mobile phones.
This news announcement sparks a lot of questions in my mind.
Users who subscribe to Verizon's Vcast service will be able to view content on the YouTube website via their mobiles.
The trial, which will begin in December, will also allow users to post video clips from their phones more easily.
First off its a little confusing because it says,
Users who subscribe to Verizon’s Vcast service will be able to view content on the YouTube website via their mobiles.
It is likely that similar tie-ups will follow as mobile operators look for a
slice of the social-networking pie.
More than 100 million video clips are viewed every day on the YouTube website.
and then states this,
The new deal will mean that VCast users, who pay $15 a month to watch and download video to their mobile, will have access to a limited number of approved videos from YouTube.
User-generated content The new deal will mean that VCast users, who pay $15 a month to watch and download video to their mobile, will have access to a limited number of approved videos from YouTube.
In contrast, the web version of the site allows users to access almost any video for free.
How do you go from saying that the Vcast service will be able to view content on the YouTube website and then say they will have access to a limited number of approved videos? First off, the YouTube.com website is a Flash/FLV based media player and Vcast is a Mpeg4 based service, would be interesting to know how they implemented that one. I assume this might be some of the reason for limited number of approved videos? because converting FLV to other formats right now is not something of a smooth process. But we are talking about going from a larger resolution to a smaller one so even if you are going from a compressed format to another you will be alright. Most YouTube.com movies are compressed alot though so I wonder if they are limiting it to videos they have the source to?
The Verizon tie-up also means users will be able to upload short clips captured on their mobile phones.
Previously, posting content from mobile handsets to YouTube required an email address but subscribers to Verizon's wireless media service Vcast will now be able to upload content using a five-digit short code.
YouTube, the online video sharing site which was recently bought by Google, had said it hoped to expand its service beyond computers.
Well like I said this new article sparked more questions then answers. It was nice to see that they hooked up a 5-digit code to send videos to for uploading videos. This should make the expansion of social-video-networking go up quite a bit. It would be really cool, this is way out there, to have this fuel Verizon’s relationship with Adobe and push the Vcast system to use FLV (and Flash Lite 2.X/3.0???) instead of or in addition to the Mpeg4 based service of right now. Anything that pushes Flash forward on the mobile device arena is cool.
The deal with Verizon is part of a limited trial for the fashionable site on the small screen.
The popularity of social networking sites such as YouTube and MySpace are increasingly attracting the eyes of mobile phone operators, desperate to increase revenues as the price of making calls continues to fall.
"The user-generated content space is a very important sector in media," said Robin Chan, marketing director at Verizon Wireless.
UK mobile phone operators have yet to enter such a tie-up although they do offer their own networking sites.
O2 has launched LookAtMe which allows users to download video clips posted by other users and 3's Kink Kommunity sees thousands of postings each day.